Cancelled!

Four honest ways to vote

Every debate is anchored to a specific public event. You pick one of four stances. That's the whole mechanic.

How it works

1. Pick a Wikipedia-backed subject and the specific event you want to debate. "Is X cancelled" isn't a debate — "the 2017 viral pineapple-pizza thing" is.
2. Cast your vote — and choose which of your private circles can see it. See how each circle voted, the broader public sentiment in Global, and how the take has shifted in the last 30 days.
3. Change your mind whenever. The app tracks it. Your circles see when a take has evolved.

Your takes, your circles

Votes live in circles — private groups of friends. Share a take with everyone, or keep it to one group. "All Circles" blends them; tap a single circle to see just that group. Make your own and invite friends from the You tab; anyone in a circle can invite their friends, and circles are invisible to anyone who isn't a member. You pick, per vote, exactly who sees it.

Real debates, not takedowns

Pop culture moments, brand decisions, sports rule changes, retro tech, online manias. All anchored to a real Wikipedia entry, all moderator-reviewed before going public.

Built to be sane

• Wikipedia-only subjects. No private individuals. No making things up about people who aren't already public figures.
• Event-anchored. Debates are about specific moments, not vague person-level prompts.
• No free-text accusations. The only writable fields are the event title and an optional source URL. Both moderator-reviewed.
• Pre-publication moderation. Every user-submitted debate is reviewed before it appears publicly.
• Aggregate-only public attribution. Inside a private circle, members can see what each other voted — and you choose, per vote, which circles get that visibility. On the public feed, only counts and plurality — never individual stances.
• Report & block on every entry. Reports go to a human moderator.
• Intended for users 17+.